Sitemap | Search | Publications | Journal
Espéraza:
the curiosity church of Rivière |
Espéraza
is an important village in the Aude region, located between Quillan and
Limoux, not too far from Couiza. It is dominated by a Visigothic tower,
which must have been the tower or keep of a small castle whose remains are
still somewhat visible on the plateau. From its door, we can see Rennes-le-Château,
which is located at the same elevation. Our primary interest in this village,
however, is its church and its priest, which had a straightforward link
with Saunière
Yet
another priest?
As
is customary for first-time visitors to the church of Rennes-le-Château,
we too will run along a number of curiosities inside the church of Espéraza,
especially those that might or are related to the known or suspected “preoccupations”
that captivated Béranger Saunière, priest of Rennes-le-Château.
Here, we see the hand of Father Rivière, stationed in Espéraza
from 1906 to 1920, before moving on to Coursan, where he lived from 1920
till 1929.
Let us note that it is this Father Rivière who listened to the confession
of his colleague of Rennes-le-Château in his hour of need and who
was so shocked from the revelations Saunière made on his deathbed
that he allegedly refused, or forgot, to give him the sacrament of the dead
he had come to administer. If it indeed happened like that, it was a very
serious omission to make – unless, of course, he heard something so
shocking, so un-Catholic, that he felt incapable of administering this rite
after having heard what Saunière told him.
But once this initial shock had settled, might Rivière, in his own
way, on his own turf – have wanted to leave a message about the contents
of the confessions Saunière had made to him, perhaps by the manner
in which he decorated his church?
Under
the watchful eyes of Saint Michael
The
sanctuary of Espéraza is somewhat quaint; indeed, its atmosphere
has something of an old, early 20th century cinema theatre. We find the
inscription “Liberté Égalité Fraternité
- Propriété communale" splashed about, underlining –
in case there was any doubt – that this sanctuary is under the jurisdiction
of the Republic, and not the Catholic Church as such. It is a reminder of
whom exactly won the French Revolution and though all churches belong to
the state, in Espéraza, it seems, the state wanted to underline this
message.
Once through the door, we do not see a statue of Asmodeus, but instead a
statue of Saint Michael, the patron saint, who is, as usual, striking down
the dragon. The dragon is often associated with caves and is made up out
of the four elements: the air for the wings; water for the scales; earth
for its serpentine format; fire for its mouth that is spewing flames.
Thus, we see some correspondence with the church of Rennes-le-Château:
there, it is the sign of the cross – four movements – and the
water – one of the four elements – that makes the devil succumb
– kneel – to the ground. Here, it is the Archangel Michael that
strikes down the demon with his spear – noting that Asmodeus in origin
had a trident in his hand, before it was placed in a “private collection”
by “an enthusiast”.
Jesus
and tombs – if not caves
Rivière,
like his colleague Saunière, adds a statue of the Virgin Mary holding
the infant Jesus in her arms. Originally located on the left of the choir,
it was later replaced by a Notre Dame des Victoires. Another surprise awaits
us in the first chapel, left when entering, where there is a grotto that
is apparently made in the same style, if not using the same stones, than
the grotto that sits in the garden in front of the church of Rennes-le-Château.
We know this construction was the work of Saunière, who went on walks
to recover the stones for this oeuvre personally. It once held a statue
of Mary Magdalene, now also “in private care”.
Nevertheless, in the church of Espéraza, the stones appear to be
blacker, smaller and more regular. But in style, it is clearly meant to
echo that what is in Rennes-le-Château. Here too, it is used to lodge
a saintly statue, this time of Christ, in his tomb – dead –
though with his eyes open. The statue is almost life-size, well-executed,
and intriguing to behold. Apart from his eyes that are open, he is placed
in a cave, with his hands positioned along his body. Hands and feet show
the signs of his crucifixion, and his side shows where he has been pierced
with a spear. One final detail: this man has a moustache, a beard and hears
that are ginger, or red.
Another
particularity needs to be underlined here. Normally, such statues are only
put on display during the Passion, i.e. the period before Easter. Only few,
in rare circumstances, are present inside a church throughout the year.
Here, it is clear that the method in which Rivière had constructed
it, meant that no dismantling could occur; this was a permanent exhibition.
So why did he do so? What was so special that he “defied” the
local customs? Though such displays are more common in churches that are
closely linked with La Sanch, here, in the Aude valley, it is an oddity.
Furthermore, what to make of the curiosity of choosing a statue that has
its eyes open? Indeed, some will point out this is not the only statue like
that. And indeed, but first, we need to ask why someone decided to offer
a statue that had a dead Jesus with his eyes open, and why Rivière
specifically picked a statue like that. It is coincidence stacked upon another
coincidence. Perhaps only those who confront this strange installation with
“open eyes” will be able to see his message?
Anyone
who has come across the object known as Saunière’s model in
the story of Rennes-le-Château will note that it references a “Tomb
of Christ”. And a Tomb of Christ is precisely what Rivière
decided to install in his church – against local customs, it has to
be underlined. If we give our imagination free rein, then we note that the
colour of his hair in French is known as “roux”, which is a
known linguistic reference to “Roussillon”, the region now known
as the Languedoc-Roussillon, the heartland of La Sanch, and also the region
in which we find Perillos, mapped by Saunière on that very model.
Is it a tongue in cheek reference? Only the ghost of Rivière will
ever be able to illuminate us here. But let us note that the reddish hair
is normally also linked with another saint, Mary Magdalene, and she is depicted
as such on a stained glass window in Saunière’s church. Coincidence,
or design? It is the central question that we have to ask wherever we turn
in this mystery.
Let us also note that on top of the grotto, there is a statue of a Christ
dressed in a red cape, his right hand open, showing the injury from the
nails that were hammered in there during the cruxifixion, his left hand
pointing to his Sacred Heart, in flames. Two Christs, one on top of the
other, in this sequence, is also in evidence – coincidentally, no
doubt? – on the pulpit of Rennes-le-Château.
The
ascent of the souls
In
front of the grotto is an altar, made from black marble. At its base is
a skull and bones design. The door of the tabernacle, also black, displays
a fleur de lys. Above the main altar, facing the grotto, is a magnificent
painting, showing the Assumption, which appears to not be the one of the
Virgin Mary, though. The panel shows a young woman, accompanied by a young
man, ascending to the heavens. The event occurs under the acclamation of
six people, who also begin to ascend. Above, a person with a gilded banner
seems to rest. Meanwhile, angels are waiting for the arrival of these people.
Lower down, a group appears to be sad, as they are unable to join them-
or are waiting their turn?
What is this painting meant to represent? Is the young man supposed to be
Christ? Are the others ascending to the heavens in his wake? Though it is
implied, it is not made explicit, and we wonder why it is indeed not explicit,
seeing there is no need to be “occult” about these aspects inside
a Church.
“Another coincidence and nothing but”, some will argue, but
indeed, again, does this painting not remind one of the collage Saunière
made in his notebook? Indeed, we see a young Jesus, with his eyes open,
rising up to the heavens aided by the angels. And below, Saunière
had written “Ascent towards eternity, the year 1891”.
From
St Etienne in Toulouse to Espéraza
It
is worthwhile to discuss this painting, as the Cathedral of Saint Etienne
in Toulouse has an identical painting. Indeed, certain small details are
different, such as the colour of the hair or the clothing. As minimal as
these differences may be – perhaps because someone was working from
a black and white design? – there are nevertheless more “serious”
differences between the two paintings. The group of people at the bottom
and the young reclining woman are absent from the Toulouse painting. It
suggests that in the painting of Espéraza, salvation – ascension
– is not solely reserved for a few, but for more. Of course, this
is but our reading of it – and perhaps the painter had something altogether
in mind.
A third difference can be seen at the top of the painting. The Espéraza
painting shows angels welcoming the ascended. At Saint Etienne, a large
ray opens on the right a type of road which is quite similar to the collage
of Saunière. Top left corner, there is a person – God the Father?
– surrounded by angels and archangels, apparently leading them to
heaven.
Finally, whereas the painting of Espéraza is quite sombre in style,
that of Saint Etienne is more luminous and colourful. To some extent that
is indeed due to the finish applied to it, but it is clear that it is more
than that.
A
grotto for a Virgin
Let
us stroll elsewhere in the church, towards another chapel which is again
decorated with stones, like the grotto, but this time more coarse, more
all-encompassing… indeed, though it is nothing more than a “wall”,
it does leave the visitor with the impression of being inside a cave. And
though from a close-up, it has a lot of charm, from a distance, it is out
of place with the keeping of the church as such.
Inside this “cave” is another cave, in which there is a statue
of the Virgin of Lourdes, depicted in her usual dress, with the usual emphasis
for the colours white and blue. If anyone were to be in doubt that this
is the Virgin of Lourdes, there is a statue of Bernadette praying in front
of her. The stained glass window behind this display has the image of the
basilica of Lourdes. And it is nearby that we find the statue of Notre Dame
de Victoires. She is placed on a whirling cloud and is represented with
her usual seven golden stars. The baby Jesus, like the Virgin, is crowned
by a fleur de lys. One index finger of the Christ points upward; the other
towards the visitor.
A
cross
On
top of the tabernacle of the altar is an old cross, in bronze. The traditional
“INRI” panel that decorates the top of the cross is in this
case inversed, resulting in a reading of IRNI. An error at the time of the
creation, or perhaps more likely, it fell off, and someone “restored”
it incorrectly? Or perhaps, indeed, it is an alchemical message, that we
need to turn things around? We are now widely speculating, but let us note
that working with “the opposite way” is in evidence in Saunière’s
church when he inversed the traditional stations of the cross – indeed,
a cross too. So, whereas in Rennes-le-Château we have to turn the
opposite way to follow the stations of the cross, in Espéraza the
cross is partially turned upside down too.
If it were an alchemical message, then we should read it as an invitation
to read what is high as below, and vice versa. The aficionados of the mystery
will also have realised that this inversion has resulted in a mirrored letter
N, which is a rather cherished ingredient of the enigma of Rennes-le-Château.
In
case some people believe we have speculated too widely, let us note that
whoever made or restored it, if he did see his error, he could have corrected
it easily, but somehow he – nor anyone after him – decided not
to do so. Why? Some might blame the usual French “laisser faire”
attitude, but what if it is not?
When we study this cross in further detail, we note that each branch of
the cross ends with a fleur de lys design, as well as a type of cockle.
Also, Jesus has his feet placed next to each, not the more usual on top
of each other, and the incision made by the spear seems to be absent.
Yet another fleur de lys, though. Though the fleur de lys appears on several
European coats of arms, it was specifically associated with the French monarchy.
Indeed, after the demise of the monarchy and the arrival of the Republic,
the fleur de lys came to typify the French monarchy – fond memories
of a good time, at least for some – and perhaps its repeated presence
in the church of Espéraza might indeed be one of the reasons why
this church was “singled out” to get the traditional Revolutionary
slogan of “Liberty, equality, fraternity” – as in brotherhood.
Like a bond between brothers – colleagues – like Rivière
and Saunière… perhaps?
Juliette
Goudin & Filip Coppens